- Home
- Search Results
- Page 1 of 1
Search for: All records
-
Total Resources4
- Resource Type
-
0000000004000000
- More
- Availability
-
31
- Author / Contributor
- Filter by Author / Creator
-
-
Jackson, Mary (4)
-
Gumbart, James C. (2)
-
Yang, Lixinhao (2)
-
Zgurskaya, Helen I. (2)
-
Acharya, Atanu (1)
-
Angala, Shiva Kumar (1)
-
Ausmus, Alex P. (1)
-
Avanzi, Charlotte (1)
-
Barrailler, Kaitlin (1)
-
Bhattarai, Pankaj (1)
-
Brenkert, Sarah (1)
-
Calisto, Lilian (1)
-
Cunningham, Katie (1)
-
Destache, Christopher J. (1)
-
Grissom, Jenny (1)
-
Hegde, Pooja (1)
-
Hodges, Heather (1)
-
Kalera, Karishma (1)
-
Killebrew, Nicole (1)
-
Larson, Darcie (1)
-
- Filter by Editor
-
-
& Spizer, S. M. (0)
-
& . Spizer, S. (0)
-
& Ahn, J. (0)
-
& Bateiha, S. (0)
-
& Bosch, N. (0)
-
& Brennan K. (0)
-
& Brennan, K. (0)
-
& Chen, B. (0)
-
& Chen, Bodong (0)
-
& Drown, S. (0)
-
& Ferretti, F. (0)
-
& Higgins, A. (0)
-
& J. Peters (0)
-
& Kali, Y. (0)
-
& Ruiz-Arias, P.M. (0)
-
& S. Spitzer (0)
-
& Sahin. I. (0)
-
& Spitzer, S. (0)
-
& Spitzer, S.M. (0)
-
(submitted - in Review for IEEE ICASSP-2024) (0)
-
-
Have feedback or suggestions for a way to improve these results?
!
Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher.
Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.
-
Marine animals without faces (MAWFs), are some of the most important creatures maintaining the ecological balance in marine environments. How these animals are depicted across conservation organizations may impact public perceptions and conservation efforts. We assessed the online presentation of sea stars, jellies, and corals among all public websites of institutions accredited by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA) (N = 237). Among the organizations with an aquarium (n = 125), only 55 (44 percent) profiled at least one of the three animals, resulting in 89 total profiles. Five general approaches to characterizing these animals emerged: (1) scientific social distancing, (2) beautiful and eye-catching, (3) grotesque, otherworldly, and strange, (4) brainless beauties, and (5) objects of touch, entertainment, and experience. While some practices, like touch exhibits, can support empathy outcomes among visitors, online profile practices may contribute to the objectification of these animals among visitors, which could ultimately impact conservation attitudes, intentions, and behaviors.more » « lessFree, publicly-accessible full text available June 1, 2026
-
Li, Yupeng; Acharya, Atanu; Yang, Lixinhao; Liu, Jinchan; Tajkhorshid, Emad; Zgurskaya, Helen I.; Jackson, Mary; Gumbart, James C. (, Biophysical Journal)
-
Hodges, Heather; Obeng, Kwaku; Avanzi, Charlotte; Ausmus, Alex P.; Angala, Shiva Kumar; Kalera, Karishma; Palcekova, Zuzana; Swarts, Benjamin M.; Jackson, Mary (, ACS Chemical Biology)
-
Bhattarai, Pankaj; Hegde, Pooja; Li, Wei; Prathipati, Pavan Kumar; Stevens, Casey M.; Yang, Lixinhao; Zhou, Hinman; Pandya, Amit; Cunningham, Katie; Grissom, Jenny; et al (, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry)
An official website of the United States government
